Bulls taking victory laps, bears crying, new highs on Friday in some sectors and charts settling the US stock market near a historically high 145% market cap to GDP.
What’s it mean? Nothing as of yet from my perch. It’s what happens next week and following the Fed’s 3rd rate cut meeting that may well decide everything. I can’t emphasize enough: The Fed has been on a tear in terms of intervention in recent weeks and is forced to intervene markets ever more aggressively on a daily basis (See: Intervention). A US military budget sized Treasury bill buying program, a daily repo facility to the tune of $120B a day, massive and unprecedented liquidity injections with little overtly apparent market stress.
In context should anyone be surprised by $SPX drifting yet again into the 3,000+ zone? No. Not even bears. After all that price zone even into 3,100 has been clearly identified as a potential technical market zone, specially for the October 2019 time frame (see Combustion). It is what happens after the October time frame that will become a lot more interesting and how technical confluences resolve themselves:
In late June we also identified the 3,000-3,050 $SPX area as a Sell Zone and that has proven twice now to be an effective technical pivot to sell against. First in July (3028 high to 2775 low on $ES) , then in September (3022 high to 2855 low on $ES). Whether this third foray into this zone for the third time will prove to be a sell remains to be seen. But for now $SPX has yet to reach the 3050 zone, but may well do so or even a bit higher. But that too remains subject to evidence and proof.
Let’s drop some facts and charts:
There remains zero evidence that markets can sustain new highs as all highs in the timespan between 2018 and 2019 have been sold and any new marginal highs have been selling opportunities in the same way that dips have been buying opportunities. Bulls need to prove that they can make sustained new highs. That proof remains outstanding.
And that proof is complicated by a number of factors that suggest that these rallies are manufactured and weak despite some improving charts.
Most notable: Markets have turned into Zombieland, hardly any humans around, but the living dead walking around.
Volumes have completely collapsed. While shrinking volumes are a common aspect during rallies (as are increasing volumes during sell-offs), this here is not your daddy’s market. $SPY average daily volume has shrunk throughout the years and now averages around 73M shares a day.
Not this week. Volumes collapsed to the lowest volume week ever (outside a holiday week with a half day thrown in), with daily volumes barely making it to 30M-35M shares, it’s stunning:
Indeed 30% of the $SPY volume of the day occur during after-hours, that’s how deserted the actual open trading hours are.
And this is not a sleepy summer week we’re talking about, this is October. Record low volume in October? Unheard of. No, this market is so dead, nobody’s home.
One key potential consequence of little to no volume? When volume comes back, and it will, there is little in the form of support being built and a serious sell event/program can rip through support like butter.
What’s driving the low volume? We can all speculate, but I’ll offer a couple thoughts:
Impeachment? It is fair to say what we’re currently witnessing in American politics is unprecedented. I won’t handicap the merits of the events, but I’ll highlight the possibility that massive uncertainty is permeating the outlook, perhaps a sense that historic events are unfolding which may be keeping people on the sidelines until the smoke clears.
Data. Let’s not beat around the bush, but this rally, all rallies, continue on multiple expansion. Retail sales? Missed. Industrial Production? Missed. Durable goods? Missed. Home sales? Missed. Consumer confidence? Missed.
Indeed on Friday the New York Fed dropped this little nugget:
.@NewYorkFed GDP Nowcast for Q4 now 0.92% https://t.co/VNb5Mo6YIp pic.twitter.com/su9SynlWjU
— Sven Henrich (@NorthmanTrader) October 25, 2019
I’m not aware of sustainable new highs with 1% GDP growth. Are you?
And so perhaps people are keenly aware that there’s a mismatch between rhetoric and reality on the ground and that’s what’s keeping people from piling with enthusiasm into stocks:
Trillion dollar deficits.
110% debt to GDP.
$120B daily repos.
$60B per month Fed balance sheet expansion.
Rate cuts galore.
Sub 2% GDP growth.
“The economy is in a good place” – Jay Powell
— Sven Henrich (@NorthmanTrader) October 25, 2019
I could go on, but you get my drift, markets continue to rally on conveniently dropped China headlines, hopium and Fed liquidity in the face of weakening economic data.
Indeed, let’s talk about Fed liquidity and the market structure.
Have you noticed how all gains are driven by magic gap ups and then nothing but tight ranges void of any real price discovery?
Friday’s sudden surge on the heels of the $AMZN earning’s miss in particular took the vertical cake:
Massive ramp beginning in pre-market going full vertical, then another non specific China headline dropped on top of it and then: Nothing. Zombieland. No volume, little to no movement. Again.
What’s driving these sudden surges in face of the data? Ask the Fed perhaps as every morning before market open they are cranking the liquidity machine now:
And so perhaps it’s no accident that on Thursday they upped their $75B facility to $120B, dropped over $134B in total liquidity on that day and magical markets print new highs on the next day as another $77B in liquidity rolled in. Massive liquidity + low volume = melt up.
Sure Janet, it’s just a giant coincidence.
Fact is the Fed is having massive problems keeping the secured overnight fund rate at bay and one wonders how much harder that will be for them when they cut rates for the third time this year.
On that note, know how absolutely hay wire their entire year has been:
A year in the life of the Fed.#study pic.twitter.com/IJ9cRNDt7z
— Sven Henrich (@NorthmanTrader) October 24, 2019
What did Jim Cramer once shout? They know nothing. That wasn’t wrong then, and perhaps it isn’t wrong now.
I can only observe and what I’m seeing is once again ever weakening in the signals.
Value line geometric index: Lower highs
$BPNDX: Lower highs.
New highs in Nasdaq while $NDX pings new all time highs: Pitiful.
I repeat: The proof of sustainability remains outstanding.
I’ll add some more food for thought: Hanging men.
A potential bearish candlestick pattern is making its presence felt on the charts:
The classic view of a hanging man:
The month is not over and a lot can happen next week, but it’s something to keep an eye on for month end as, ironically, this strength we’re currently seeing may be signaling a bearish chart signal.
And don’t forget there is precedence for a July high followed by an October high:
That marginal new high in October 2007 was a life time selling opportunity. The driver of that rally to new highs then? The Fed cutting rates in September all the while saying things were fine, no recession coming.
So where does this leave us? With slowing growth, multiple expansion and a market living off record low volume and perhaps artificial liquidity fueled open ramps with the $VIX crushed as a result:
$VIX filled one of its open gaps on Friday and may even tackle the next one down, but that’s a lot of $VIX crushing for very little gains achieved.
Indeed $VIX has approached key trend support while $SPX is once again confined to a very tight channel:
Until broken that channel has risk higher, but $VIX continues to signal risk much higher and perhaps some other folks are recognizing this as very bullish $VIX option trades were just placed.
As it stands that big megaphone structure is still intact:
As I said this summer: Bulls need to break above the upper trend line and then defend it as support to prove their case. And despite ever so marginal new highs printed intra-day during a record low volume Zombieland week bulls still haven’t been able to conquer that line despite all the Fed interventions and China trade deal jawboning headlines in the world. China deal going great is the tired daly rallying cry that keeps working despite the prospect of a China deal now having seemingly devolved into a phase 1 soybean deal that has been priced in over and over again since the spring.
Next week the Fed will be forced to cut rates again for the third time this year as they can’t afford to not cut rates for fear of disappointing markets. So far this year all Fed rate cuts have been sold. Bulls need to prove they can make sustained new highs. So far they haven’t, but have been living off of the artificial liquidity machine the Fed is so eagerly providing.
That liquidity injection machine may well succeed in causing a melt-up unsupported by fundamentals, but until I see anything structurally and factually substantive to support these equity valuations market strength and extreme low volatility conditions occurring on the underside of the upper megaphone trend line remain a selling opportunity. And there better be something substantive coming soon or this market is so dead.
For the latest public analysis please visit NorthmanTrader. To subscribe to our market products please visit Services.
All content is provided as information only and should not be taken as investment or trading advice. Any investments, trades, and/or speculations made in light of the ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise. For further details please refer to the disclaimer.
Categories: Market Analysis, Weekly Market Brief
Thanks Sven! Although can’t see where you posted, 3050/3100 in Sell Zone, must have been in other posts around that time
Sell Zone discussed 3000-3050 in the embedded video.
👍I do recall seeing you say 3050 somewhere
Likewise, nothing mentioned in Combustion either
Specific discussion of the 2.618 fib near 3,100 in Combustion. It’s all there. Here’s the specific chart:
Excellent anaysis, as always!
Excellent Analysis. You are my guru for all the information you have provided. Hopefully someday I can afford your subscription.
Thanks Sven. I started following you this year and found the technical analysis combined with the macro observations aligned with my view/approach very much. However, would you mind sharing your thoughts on treasuries like TLT or something on the bond side?
It’s called the Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF) cabal. They are the Treasury, the Fed, the BIS, TBTF banks, etc. They have been pricing everything to where they want it.
there is no need for volume to an algorithm…and with the ability to implement extremely tight stops with each algorithm you have reduced the amount of emotion that normally sways a market…and if you read some of the “always a bull” pundits you see the never ending euphoria and criticism of the Fed…there are many calling for the potential collapse while at the same time the Bulls mentioning the amount of cash on the sidelines…so this Bull vs Bear scenario continues to exacerbate itself in webs its as much as it does in the charts..
I look to Sven’s analysis the same way I look to NY Times editorialists: As a reminder of what healthy, normal processes looks like, in contrast to the Potemkin village we now inhabit.
Thank you for your analysis. I am curious about the repo operations and the reason for the sudden demand for cash. So:
If you don’t like growth stocks-valuation
And you don’t like value stocks-run up and valuation
And you don’t like Bonds as rates rise,
Wouldn’t you then just sell and go to cash? Could this represent a stealth run on the bank as sellers refuse to reinvest proceeds as all corners of the market are unattractive? In your mind, what is causing this sudden need for cash? The first explanation was quarter-end tax payments etc. This has gone on too long for that explanation to hold water. Wonder if there will be pointed questions from the press at Powell’s press conference?
Sven, I know you’re a man who likes to note open gaps which beckon to be filled. Of course, there are some open gaps on the Two from the early 1930s that are unlikely to fill. The move to a record high in QQQ on friday closed, finally, the open gap down from 7/26/2019, where QQQ had closed at 195.29 and never made it above 195.18 the next day.
That having been said, the recent rise in QQQ has left behind a lot of close and far gaps; last week at 2% below the current close in the 192 range; a gap through 190 the week before; and of course all the gaps from the December 2018 V-bottom.
Having closed the open downside gap from the previous high in July, what is your time period for the closing of the upside gaps that got us to the new high? Also, does a gap have to close all the way, or is something like hitting 195.22 on the 195.29-195.18 gap enough?
Thanks for your work, and I’m looking forward to subscribing in the new year.
One Gap I have been asking about that was never replied to…July of 2009…
Stupid auto-correct. Open gaps on the DOW from the early 1930s. I frankly don’t care to see those close, and I doubt any bear does!
They gonna print until they fall dead…it will end with Helicopter money…let’s face it: financial markets don’t really exist anymore. It’s one big charade.
The China trade deal is probably more about setting up a joint commodity price setting mechanism that benefits both countries. Western Globalists have stripped 3rd world countries of most of their wealth already.Africa is the New Hunting ground for USA and China.
My guess is short covering on those gap ups. As of today the short positions are almost a yearly low for the SPX. So I think we are very near the top.
Sven, any idea what specific assets all of the liquidity being injected into the market is supporting? Excess reserves are still falling, so the cash injected by the fed isn’t going to support major banks.