QE Infinity

It’s finally official. QE Infinity is here, so announced today by Mario Draghi at his final press conference as the head of the ECB. Not only QE, but also joining Turkey and Denmark as the latest countries to cut rates this year. Just today and many more to come.

I’ve opined on the subject quite a bit on twitter already today, but what happened today deserves some additional points to be made, mainly because of the intellectual bankruptcy permeating our entire market structure.

Let’s start with the main point:

It’s the point critics of these policies have been predicting for years. Permanent intervention is needed to hold the construct up. These policies never went everywhere. Whatever inflation or growth targets were promised never materialized. Whatever promises of normalization were made never came to fruition. All lies and false promises.

Year after year central bankers have come out, made promises and projections only to push them further into the distance and kept pressing the dovish button. Mario Draghi being the worst offender.

But of course he didn’t get booed out of the press conference. Draghi was free to bullshit his way through the press conference with flat out nonsense like this:

Really? Where?

Inflation expectations (the stated goal of his policies) have trended down ever since the financial crisis.

Let’s add QE to the mix and whaddya got?


Growth? In what? GDP?

Trending down and like the US on an ever slowing path from cycle to cycle. That may not be Draghi’s fault. Demographics, technology, a messy conglomeration of nations trying to operate a common union and currency. Nobody can blame Draghi for that. What one can blame Draghi for is the utter dishonesty of it all making claims that are simply not true.

Negative rates have not produced growth, more likely they have hindered growth. Check the European banking sector if you don’t believe.

Heck, check the ECB’s own GDP forecast for the next 3 years:

That’s what you get with QE infinity and negative rate infinity. Nothing. 1% growth. Congrats.

So an outrageous statement to make. But worse than the statement: None of the reporters present challenged Draghi. He never got challenged by reporters during his tenure, just submissive note taking, moving onto the next question adding no value all the while seeing his promised not come to fruition.

And so Draghi leaves office with a perfect dovish score of 4.68 trillion Euro with a policy of QE infinity on the table for his successor Christine Lagarde to not only embrace but to double down on.

Why am I ranting and complaining about all this?

Well, for one, I don’t like being lied to and a concerted effort of deception is what the entire central banking cabal is engaged in during every policy meeting and press conference as they keep dancing about a key truth: With a fragile global economy the world is one confidence sapping 10%-20% market correction away from triggering a global recession. Central banks know this. Preventing this is the prime directive. Everything else is noise.

And unaccountable to policy failure they keep doubling down on policies that have prompted record wealth inequality spurred not by growth in the larger economy but by growth in vast asset price inflation benefitting the very few:

Structural bears have of course warned against this for years. But of course central banks are doubling down again now that all their projections have turned out to be wrong. And bulls are once again counting on central banks to bail them out as all their projections have turned out the wrong. Yield implosion this year? Didn’t see it coming. GDP growth projections? Too optimistic.

Earnings forecasts? All off:

Price target reductions as a result? Nah, Let’s raise price targets. Why? Multiple expansion courtesy rate cuts, QE and intervention.

Look, anybody can be wrong. I’ve been wrong. Bulls were massively wrong in 2018 and frankly they are wrong again in 2019 for the reasons I outlined. But then say that you were wrong and say that you are entirely reliant on central bank intervention to bail out the overstated earnings forecasts. At least that would be honest.

And I repeat: No bull market without central bank intervention. And this is precisely what bulls are counting on, that the almost recession can be averted agin like in 2012 and 2016:

And what, precisely, prompted these “resets”? Central bank intervention. In 2012 it was the Fed’s QE3, in 2016 it was the combined efforts of global central banks leading to $5.5 trillion in intervention. And now bulls are counting on these intervention programs to succeed again.

But of course there may be a problem or two:

First we’re coming from rock bottom to start with which raises the unanswered efficacy question I keep wondering about?

Why efficacy? Because there’s this thing called yield curves that is now re-soundly dismissed by many. There are no yield curve inversions in 2012 nor in 2016. But of course bulls want to dismiss yield curve inversions like everything else, so strong is the faith in central bank efficacy.

But ignore yield curve inversions at your own risk:

Corporate profitability has a lot of catching up to do. But then perhaps this market no longer needs corporate profitability I understand. We have QE infinity and permanent multiple expansion.

Come on. Get real. QE infinity will not produce growth and neither will more negative rates. At best they can hope for is prevent a major market sell off to trigger a confidence bust leading to a recession. But the jury on this remains out. All new highs over the past 18 months have been sold.  All highs have come on central bank promises. As we are making new highs on the heels of the ECB decision and perhaps the Fed next week the question of efficacy will reveal itself. Failure is not an option for central banks. Question is how much longer investors will be contented with being lied to.

For the latest public analysis please visit NorthmanTrader. To subscribe to our market products please visit Services.

All content is provided as information only and should not be taken as investment or trading advice. Any investments, trades, and/or speculations made in light of the ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise. For further details please refer to the disclaimer.

Categories: Opinion

22 replies »

  1. They have no choice, print and “live” a little longer or…stop printing and die, fast and furious! They’ll never consider the third option….print, live a little longer and implode for ever!

  2. I don’t agree with the NIRP but something that Draghi have been complaining for a long time is the lack of fiscal stimulus by governmentals, tight to a germanized deficit control. Now, all fload gates should be open, as he stated “European governments should rip up their deficit targets and borrow more, to encourage growth.” No more tight deficits. This stimuls should be made from demand side so it’s time for fiscal policies with ECB backend. I believe Germany, due to its economical situation, will breake on the limits to ECB’s bond purchasing program (task to the ‘clueless person in the room’, aka Lagarde).

  3. it’s very simple: we live in the biggest financial charade ever. We all know how it will end….in a total fiasco. When? Nobody knows.

  4. While they would like inflation to rise, never mind how questionable this project is, and they say that’s what they want what they actually want is for their assets to inflate. Corporate assets including of course that most important segment, bank assets.

    In truth that has always been the end goal of capitalism. The dream of some pure form of capitalism with well distributed wealth is and always has been a fairy tale.

    • You don’t know what capitalism is. If there was capitalism during the GFC, banks would have gone bankrupt and the bankers imprisoned. What we have is fascism. Government and Corporations working together for their own benefit. Or socialism for the rich. I bet you are a socialist ? Well, congrats, you already have it for the rich. And you will demand more of it when socialism fails again. It fails every single time.

      • Totally correct. We do NOT live in a capitalist system….in some sort of oligarchy (big government & large corporations & uber rich).

  5. The honest solution would be to admit there is no real big growth and a number of companies would have to close.

    This would however destroy our status quo: Have your home (with a mortgage on it), have 1-2 cars (also “lent” by some bank), various running contracts like for a cell phone, netflix, amazon, you name it and barely a / or a non-existing saving plan for retirement.
    Not to forget 2x holiday trips per year, a minimum.

    And overall the major goal is to try to make it to the retirement, so the “real” life can finally begin!

  6. Sven,

    I think you will have a positive impact on the final outcome, being that you get enough exposure that at least a few central banks are going to see some of your analysis. At the very least you can be know as the “one guy” who predicted the central bank end game. If the business cycle is replaced forever with the liquidity “Fed” cycle, this will, as some impossible to predict time frame, end in a way that will end in prolonged government and social decay. Each day the central banks prolong the inevitable, the bigger the fallout for the future of humankind…predictable and sad, I agree.

  7. This just feels like the longest game of musical chairs in history. At some point the music will stop and there will no chairs and no winner. Where is the “big short” in this scenario?

  8. Draghi’s has always stated at his news conferences that if he did not take these measures of QE and cutting interest rates to zero or negative is that the alternative of doing nothing would have been infinitely worse meaning a total economic collapse and financial banking collapse so he pats himself on the back for saving the financial system and the European economy.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.