Weekly Market Brief

CONfidence

Markets are subject to a giant con game. The game of CONfidence. Confidence must be maintained under all circumstances or we’re heading into a global recession first and then a US recession to follow.

Consider the macro context here: Nine major economies are either in recession or on the verge of it. This includes Germany, UK, Italy, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Singapore, South Korea, Russia. Everything else is slowing down hard. Yields are plummeting for a reason and once again the world is looking to central banks to bail everyone out and for stimulus programs to be launched to rescue a global economy that hasn’t been able to do without in 10 years. US consumers are holding the US economy up is the consensus as they keep spending for now, but already we saw a dip in confidence. Why? Trade tensions, political tensions, and yes, concerns that the longest business cycle may come to an end. Add scary stock market headlines and before you know it the consumer is holding back.

And hence confidence must be maintained under all circumstances. This has been the game for 10 years and hence any market drops that would add pressure to confidence must be averted. You really think it’s an accident we see intervention always at the point of serious trouble?

Retail sales dropped hard in December as markets plummeted. It’s no coincidence. Hence any prolonged malaise must averted.

As Mohamed El-Erian pointed out so clearly this week:

“We may end up in a situation where people read these alarmist headlines, they get concerned, they stop spending. As they stop spending, companies stop investing. And then we get a major slowdown:” ⁦

Alarmist headlines? How about headlines that point out reality? But the larger point is clear: Lose the consumer and a recession is unfolding perhaps more quickly than anyone can imagine. After all nobody on the planet called for a 1.5% US 10 year yield in 2019 or a German 10 year bund at -0.72%.

And nobody in 2018 called for a renewed global easing cycle to go in full swing in 2019. But these are now reality. And this reality reveals a larger truth:

Without intervention, without stimulus, without artificial help markets fall apart. If the Fed doesn’t cut rates in September markets plunge. Plain fact. If the ECB doesn’t cut rates and outline a new QE program Europe is heading full into recession. If China or Switzerland or others don’t interfere in their currency markets things fall apart. These actions are taken out of desperation and make for an unspoken admission:

Markets can’t be left on their own. Economies can’t be left on their own. We must always intervene. Our market system no longer functions without intervention, be it central bank or fiscally driven.

It is no accident that Blackrock is lobbying for the ECB to buy stocks directly, it is no accident that they are lobbying for  “helicopter” money to bail out the system in the full recognition that the central bank intervention gig is reaching a point of no return, a loss of efficacy.

2019 should be known as the year when central banks began to choke at the absurdity of the market structure they have imposed on the world. 10 years of intervention with little growth to show for except rampant debt expansion, ever expanding wealth inequality and absolutely no admission of failure. The Fed’s spectacular policy error and failure to recognize the impending shift in the global economy that was well advertised in advance makes them just as guilty as everyone else that failed to see what was happening. Again. Always chasing reality. Never admitting mistakes. Why? Because CONfidence must be maintained. If the supposed stewards of the economy don’t know what they’re doing why should anyone have confidence in their ability to prevent what the bond market signaling? Best keep pretending we know what we’re doing.

And it is precisely because of deteriorating confidence and data that President Trump spectacularly choked this week. Having threatened to raise tariffs further on China with markets all time highs in July it suddenly blew up in his face as markets sold off hard and recession risk exploded to the upside with yield curves inverting. Quick to try to repair the damage he suddenly announced a delay in tariffs only to see the resulting rally falter and the $DJIA drop 800 points in one day. No wonder he called the big bank CEOs. Not the kind of headlines you want to see if you’re running for re-election. Hence the after market close tweets to suddenly say nice things about President Xi and to sheepishly suggest a face to face meeting, all are a classic attempts at jawboning and this weekend’s announcement to give Huawei reprieve is part of the same strategy.

Bring trade hope back, bring optimism back. How long markets will fall for this remains to be seen. Strategically this public capitulation however gives the Chinese the upper hand in the trade war negotiations. They sense weakness, the weakness that’s obvious to everyone. Trump can’t afford a recession in 2020 nor deteriorating economic sentiment. How will the Chinese take advantage of this? This remains to be seen, but the longer there is no resolution the higher the risk of a global recession.

Don’t expect Trump to be beneath agreeing to a shoddy marketing deal, as long as it’s serves the larger purpose, and there in lies the risk for bears: Get a surprise truce, or even a shoddy deal and a massive relief rally, spurring confidence back up, can certainly ensue into Q4 and push the global recession another year or 2 further into the future.

See massive rate cuts and stimulus announcements and asset prices can once again race to the upside at least in the short term. That is the bull case. Intervention. Because this is what it takes.

And it is absolutely necessary here as the 2019 up trend has been broken:

and as markets have once again rejected new highs and dropped below previous highs:

And here’s the problem in all this. When central banks have normalized and have plenty of ammunition they have efficacy. But they haven’t normalized and when the business cycle turns in earnest a couple of rate cuts are not enough. Far from it. In 2000 and 2007 it took 500bp+in rate cuts to stop the bleeding. And Blackrock I suspect knows this, hence the call for helicopter money.

How do you introduce helicopter money with the US already running a trillion dollar deficit? With a political system that’s entirely broken at this point? Beats me.

And so the parade to maintain confidence continues. The daily headlines, the jawboning, the ever more dovish central bankers. Next week we get to hear from them all at Jackson Hole, and in September we get showered with more announcements of rate cuts and stimulus.

For the Fed the choice is clear: Blow the market valuation wall beyond its historic limits or risk a massive sell-off by disappointing and ruin confidence. For the ECB the choice is also clear: Cut rates from negative to more negative and re-introduce more QE or risk immediate recession. Happy retirement Mario Draghi. The central banker who never raised rates and never did anything but print money. Congrats.

For Donald Trump the choice is also clear: Insist on the trade war with no real solution in sight and risk blowing his re-election chances or cave. That he is willing to cave and bow to market pressure he has already shown this week.

For bulls there is no choice but hope intervention works again, because without intervention natural price equilibrium is much lower. And so the bull case is once again dependent on central bank intervention to bring about multiple expansion. No intervention, no bull case. That’s the state of markets.

And so the next few weeks are an important journey of price discovery in context of markets that have just broken their 2019 up trend and face lots of overhead resistance. Last week gave us short term oversold readings, but no true fear bottom.

Welcome to the battle for CONfidence.

For a run down of the technicals please see the video below:

To get notified of future videos feel free to subscribe to our YouTube Channel.


For the latest public analysis please visit NorthmanTrader. To subscribe to our market products please visit Services.

All content is provided as information only and should not be taken as investment or trading advice. Any investments, trades, and/or speculations made in light of the ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise. For further details please refer to the disclaimer.

Advertisements

34 replies »

  1. Without doubt one of your better updates Mr. Henrich, very concise, realistic and insightful information on just how dependent the markets are on manipulation. If the day ever comes when our federal reserve starts buying equities (albeit we probably would’t know they were) it will be a sad state of affairs. Thanks for keeping us so well informed.

  2. “they have resorted to exhortations, pleading tearfully for restored confidence. They know only the rules of a generation of self-seekers. ”
    FDR’s first inaugural adress

  3. I’m going to print this article and put it on my board. Absolute masterpiece. Love the quote: “Happy retirement Mario Draghi. The central banker who never raised rates and never did anything but print money. Congrats.”, sounds like an easy job!

  4. Pingback: ‘Con’-fidence
  5. “You have no choice but to vote for me because your 401(k), everything is going to be down the tubes,” Trump told the crowd in Manchester. “Whether you love me or hate me, you’ve got to vote for me.” (8/15/2019)

    Why would anyone thing they could get elected by manipulating the average $25,000 401k balance another $2,500 (10%). It is crazy to think one gets elected by 401k balance distortion by a few thousand dollars, as the top 10% of the country owns 80% of the market, thus I doubt the bottom 90% care one bit about richh folk’s 401ks. That said, most of my friends are in the top 1% and I know none of them who will vote for the Wall Street Dotard in 2020 as they see him crashing the entire ponzi soon enough instead.

    As far as helicopter money, the last pres did the small social security tax rate reduction during the last recession, and it did work while it lasted. What was really needed was a $10,000 check to every American above the age of 18. Yet for some odd reason, Dems want to give money only to the poor and Repubs only want to give to the rich, so the middle class will most likely get left out once again and we can muddle through for another decade or two as the middle class wage slaves drive the real economy, not the rich and/or poor.

  6. Sven – The markets will most like rip up another 10-20% with a weak trade “breakthrough”, although I do not think we have another 2 years before a 40-60% multi-year volatile fallout occurs. Personally, I think the best investments are not in the stock market, intead I invest in income producing assets such as farmland and real estate. Both could easily go up another 50% in a few short years if the average interest rates drop to Japan levels of 0.6%. A drop from 3.6% to 0.6% is a 50% gain in capital investment as the asset values always seem to inflate to the same payment values over time. And hey maybe will will have Denmark negative loan rates soon enough, and push this game out another 10 to 20 years. For more on global loan rates:

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-08-18/negative-mortgages-set-another-milestone-in-a-no-rate-world?srnd=premium

  7. Can you please retired the word “jawbone”? Or find a synonym?

    You’ve single-handedly made the word sound ridiculous through overuse.

    Sort of like how all the lefties killed “bombshell” during the collusion hoax…

    • Hallelujah! Maybe when he sees multiple people pointing out this kind of adjectivorial genocide, it will ease. Of course, the overuse of a few adjectives, is also indicative of a very repetitive thesis. I guess one must produce copy when one is paid to produce copy…….

  8. I distrust this guy’s technical analysis because he’s such a rabid anti-trumper. You can almost feel him (and CNN) rooting for the recession to start during trump’s first term. How am I supposed to believe this analysis is free of political bias?!

Comment:

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.